Blog posts

  • It is a shame

    I am still here
    Hand at my ear
    I hear nothing
    Year after year
    Is it just me
    Or are you there
    And will you speak
    To me again?
    Make no mistake
    You were wrong but
    Then forgiven
    And knowing that
    Both you and I
    It is shame that
    Is your prison

  • “Resistance is futile”

    —how the public service defends the indefensible

    Text:

    Stephen J. Williams
    keyed.subnet.0s@icloud.com

    Secretariat
    Members of the Not-for-profit Stewardship Group
    nfpstewardshipgroup@ato.gov.au
    and
    Pete Robjent
    Director, Not-for-profit Unit, The Treasury
    charitiesconsultation@treasury.gov.au

    Ref: MC26-004062

    re: Administrative circumvention and
    the subversion of regulatory integrity

    Mr Robjent

    Thank you for your correspondence of 27 March 2026. Your response, however, serves as a deeply troubling admission that the Australian Government has chosen to prioritise political patronage over the impartial application of the law.

    Your central premise—that ‘prior ineligibility is the precondition’ for a specific listing—is a logical absurdity. It suggests that the findings of the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC), the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, and the Full Federal Court are merely optional hurdles that the executive may ignore at its discretion. If an organisation is found to be a ‘political lobby group’ rather than a ‘benevolent institution’ by every relevant judicial and regulatory body in the country, it is because that organisation does not warrant a taxpayer-funded subsidy. To treat this failure as a ‘precondition’ for a special legislative carve-out is to openly mock the rule of law.

    If there were any possibility I might get a detailed explanation about this matter, I would ask you to explain the following points of failure in the logic of your reply:

    Your department’s public guidelines state that specific listing is reserved for ‘exceptional circumstances.’ Given that Equality Australia’s own representatives have stated that there is ‘nothing unique or exceptional’ about their listing, by what objective metrics did the Treasury determine they met this threshold? In the absence of such metrics, the decision appears to be a clear case of ideological bias.

    Your department’s internal Explanatory Materials for the Deductible Gift Recipient (DGR) reforms admit that the specific listing regime ‘lacks compliance infrastructure’ and has ‘a low level of regulatory oversight.’ Why has the government chosen to move a controversial advocacy group, already accused of ‘channelling’ donations through Thorne Harbour Health to bypass tax rules, into a category that is shielded from the ACNC’s routine audits?

    The Full Federal Court ruled unanimously in 2024 that Equality Australia’s advocacy is ‘too far removed’ from traditional concepts of benevolence. By overriding this finding, is the Treasury now establishing a new policy where ‘political lobbying’ is considered a ‘community benefit’ equivalent to the direct relief of poverty or sickness? If so, when can other political lobby groups expect their specific listings?

    DGR status is a public subsidy funded by all Australian taxpayers. The Treasury has facilitated a financial advantage for an organisation that actively campaigns against the legal protections of religious schools. This is a departure from the principle of state neutrality and represents the government ‘picking a winner’ in a contested social debate. (Further, and perhaps more important, the specific advocacy of Equality Australia includes support for medical treatments for minors that are currently being restricted in other jurisdictions. Critics have highlighted the closure of the Tavistock child gender clinic in the United Kingdom following the Cass Report as evidence that the treatments promoted by Equality Australia are a matter of intense medical and public debate. By subsidising an organisation that campaigns for these treatments at a time of global reassessment, the Australian Government is effectively taking a side in a global medical controversy using taxpayer funds. Your letter provides no evidence that the potential for ‘public harm’ or the ‘medical uncertainty’ of these treatments was considered during the DGR assessment process.)

    The listing of Equality Australia within an ‘omnibus’ bill regarding superannuation and wine taxes was a transparent attempt to stifle debate and avoid the scrutiny that a standalone measure would attract. Does the Treasury consider it ‘good lawmaking’ to bundle controversial political payouts with uncontroversial industry support measures?

    Your suggestion that concerns regarding conduct be raised with the ACNC is a vacuous deflection. The ACNC has already spoken ( https://archive.is/gpW5Y ) on this organisation’s fundamental nature and was ignored. The issue at hand is not Equality Australia’s conduct, but the Treasury’s decision to reward a legal failure with a legislative gift.

    I look forward to a response that addresses these systemic failures in logic and integrity rather than one that relies on bureaucratic scripts.

    Respectfully,
    Stephen J. Williams

    cc. Members of the Not-for-profit Stewardship Group

  • People. People who need people

    Barbra Streisand
    ‘People – People who need people’—spoken by an artificial voice of Stephen J. Williams.

    People act based on the trust they have in the voice in their head.  People addicted to something, and maybe even to addiction.  People appeal to the authority of their own experience but require everyone else to have paid their dues to a professional association.  People are definitely not the same everywhere and you tell this just by looking at them, or talking to them, or listening to them.  People are keenly aware that there are all kinds of people but that there are many ways in which all people are alike, and sometimes unnervingly alike.  People are more or less conscientious at different points in their lives.  People are more or less in tune with reality.  People are more or less unaware that they’re naïve.  People are more or less, more or less.  People are the same everywhere, or so people say; but do you believe it?  People are very different when they’re around other people, so if you want to know who you really are, stay away from other people.  People are very different when they’re around other people, so if you want to know who someone else really is, don’t tell them you’re watching.  People are well-advised to keep their opinions to themselves.  People ask if it’s possible to make a low-carb cheesecake, either with a crust or with no crust at all.  People ask if they can ask a question before they ask a question.  People ask if they can call you and expect that you will answer the text message immediately.  People ask if they can call you instead of just calling you.  People ask if they can finish work early.  People ask if they can use a Christmas cake recipe to make an Easter fruit cake.  People assess where they are in the pecking order.  People assess whether a just outcome has been reached or if more struggle, pain, and bullshit are required.  People assess whether an explanation is complete, or complete enough.  People assess whether it is the right moment to put up their hand.  People assess whether something is a threat or a challenge.  People assess whether the building is going to stay ‘up.’  People assess whether there’s something to be gained from ‘friending’ you.  People assess whether they’ve endured enough discomfort before going to the dentist to get more.  People assess whether things are the right price. 

    People being interviewed sometimes answer Yes to every proposal about what their art means.  People believe in other people.  People believe in themselves.  People believe stupid shit.  People believe that things are going to turn out OK.  People believe what the voice in their head tells them, even though it’s not an actual voice.  People believe what the voice in their head tells them, unless it turns out to be someone else’s voice.  People belong to an ethnic minority and religious majority.  People bullshitting you often proceed without any regard for alethic modalities. 

    People can be differentiated and categorised by what or whom they ‘love.’  People can be intolerant of intolerance.  People can change.  People can love death and love loving death.  People can love life and love loving life.  People can no longer distinguish artificial intelligence personas from humans in a Turing test.  People can no longer expect a job for life.  People can no longer read a book or watch a movie without the assurance of a trigger warning.  People can no longer wait one week for the next episode of anything.  People can serve at tennis without grunting.  People can sing without smiling.  People can talk without smiling.  People change.  People click ‘Love’ all day.  People compulsively verbalising find it nigh-on impossible to meditate or even to think straight.  People copulate. 

    People die unexpectedly.  People disagree about how to solve the most important questions of our time.  People distinguish between ‘poetry’ and ‘prose.’  People divide themselves into more and more tribes.  People do ‘give a shit.’  People do, that’s true.  People don’t ‘give a shit,’ that’s also true. 

    People enter monasteries.  People enter new phases.  People enter through entrances.  People enter writing ‘competitions.’ 

    People fabricate lies, as if those lies were made of whole cloth.  People fall off their high horses.  People fantasise about the strangest things.  People fellate, if they’re that way inclined.  People fiddle about with violins.  People flip burgers.  People fly aeroplanes. 

    People get a high-interest loan to build a house of cards.  People get high.  People get pregnant, and these people are often called ‘women.’  People get taken for a ride.  People get Ubers.  People go bananas.  People go crazy.  People go places.  People go to extraordinary lengths.  People grizzle and moan.  People grow up. 

    People hankering for sushi, or pickles, or almond croissants.  People have no fucking idea what is going on.  People hear the voice in their head singing.  People hip-hop their way to the Olympic Games to break-dance their hearts away.  People hobnob with people they think are dickheads. 

    People imagine other people getting killed.  People interpret stories as stories about themselves, about people they know, and about the places they know, filling in gaps and plastering over scenes that are outside of their experience; and this suggests there is a strong relationship between reading fiction and dreaming. 

    People judge other people.  People judge others to make sense of chaos by forming opinions and categories, or to avoid thinking about their own shame or inadequacy. 

    People know there are no dumb questions because it’s sometimes useful to force ourselves to give the answers we think we know.  People know there are people who argue the world is flat just to see how annoying they can be.  People know there are people who think the world is flat.  People know there are those among you who have already decided that being obtuse is the best rhetorical strategy for putting people in their place.  People know there are unexpected events, like ‘plot twists,’ and these could be interpreted as detours. 

    People learn from pain.  People learn how to read.  People learn how to speak, in their head, to themselves, as they read.  People learn to cope with longing.  People longing to be loved.  People longing to love and be loved.  People love longing and sometimes love it more than love. 

    People miscalculate their dance moves.  People move things from one place to another place because they’re in the trucking business.  People move things from one place to another place, and they follow the things there. 

    People naturally tend to organise experiences and memories into narratives.  People naturally tend toward inertia, or is it entropy?  People never change.  People nitpick, criticise, and undermine. 

    People over sixty years-of-age, with a good general knowledge of popular music or cinema, could reasonably be expected to know the song to which the title of this story refers.

    People parent little people.  People plan all their working lives for retirement.  People play banjos.  People play chess.  People play what they say are games, but which do not involve ‘playing’ in the way that word is normally used.  People play with themselves.  People play word games.  People point at stuff and suggest it is amusing or interesting.  People populate the planet.  People prompt memories by presenting alphabetically organised propositions.  People prompt thoughts and feelings in much the same way.  People pupple papple pipple pepple poople. 

    People quartered anyone who attempted regicide, tying their limbs to four horses and tearing them apart.  People question whether John Lennon could, really, have been a good person if he spat in customers’ sandwiches when he worked at Liverpool Airport.  People quibble about the most trivial things when there is something important on their minds.  People quiz other people. 

    People read stories aloud to themselves.  People read themselves into everything they read.  People remember best what they want to remember.  People remember some things they would prefer not to remember.  People remember what they have done.  People remember who they were.  People remember, sometimes with pride and sometimes with shame.  People remind us of stuff we’d prefer to forget or would enjoy remembering.  People revolting against the revolution.  People revolting.  People ritualise remembering and forgetting, though they tend to do the forgetting on their own and with rituals that are private. 

    People say they ‘Like’ something when they really don’t give a shit.  People shout ‘Fire!’ in a crowded theatre, but not as often as you might have been led to believe.  People speak appalling French. 

    People take care of their parents.  People think about death, morning, noon, and night.  People think about fat people.  People think about getting married.  People think about the people they think are attractive.  People think of their lives as a story.  People think so-and-so is a real character.  People think so-and-so is a son-of-a-such-and-such.  People think so-and-so is an arsehole.  People thought it seemed like a good idea at the time.  People tolerant of intolerance.  People toss salad.  People trust the voice in their head, even though it is not really a voice, does not make a sound, and seems to stand within us, helping us to rehearse our lines.  People try to pretend their demands for justice aren’t simply a deflection of their personal misery. 

    People unafraid to announce they have unpopular opinions.  People unafraid to speak in public.  People unassumed to be afraid, or assumed to be unafraid, sometimes turn out to be chicken. 

    People vacate just before going forth.  People vociferate more and more because there are more and more ways to do it.  People vote against the revolution.  People vote ‘Labour’ or ‘Labor,’ depending on the country in which they are voting. 

    People want to get a prize for some complaint about how other people behave.  People who are ‘my’ people.  People who are always ‘honored’ to be the object of even a sycophant’s attention.  People who are loners.  People who are Marxists, despite all the evidence.  People who are Rousseau-ists and want to take other people’s children away and give those kids a good talking-to.  People who are someone else’s people.  People who are sophisticated.  People who are tribal.  People who believe that fiction can still be fiction if it has no story.  People who believe they are ‘sophisticated.’ People who don’t know what art is but know what it is when they see it.  People who go on long walks.  People who have lists of people who will come to their next launch or opening.  People who know they are alone and no one and nothing is ever coming to save them from being alone.  People who would prefer not to know or ever to have thought they are alone.  People who know what art is but don’t like saying that they know what art is when they see something that is not art.  People who like country music, or even reggae.  People who make a profession out of ‘workshopping’ poetry.  People who make a profession out of being a gatekeeper of good taste.  People who make a profession out of choosing between one thing and another thing.  People who make a profession out of judging which are the best cheeses.  People who make a profession out of teaching people to write business emails.  People who make a profession out of writing complicated sentences.  People who no longer confess or admit to any human frailty.  People who think about how they will be remembered.  People who think about the best way to stay off the primrose path to hell.  People who think they are loners but are not really loners.  People who understand how scare quotes are used.  People who will mull over their legacy.  People who wonder if they have left their mark.  People with ‘artistic’ jobs.  People with artistic ‘hobbies.’  People with sinecures. People wonder about how things are going to turn out.  People wonder if anyone really has the faintest idea.  People wonder if they’re going to be ‘found out.’  People wonder what their pets know about them.  People worry about different shit when they’re rich.  People worry about money, health, relationships, and sleep.  People worry about the wrong things.  People worry that worrying can be harmful. 

    People x-ray luggage at airports because, you know, your stuff might have cancer.  People xenotransplant pig organs to save a life—even though it kills the pig.  People xerox unimportant documents because the tax office might need the copies later.  People xylograph forest scenes into pieces of timber. 

    People yearning for fulfilment.  People yearning for more from life.  People yearning for more from the people they thought were their partners but who turned out to be a dead weight attached to the prospect of happiness.  People yearning for more than just whatever they have a hankering for. 

    People zapping each other are generally of the superhero kind, or electricians.  People zeroise data they say is sensitive when, really, it’s just porn.  People zhoosh their hair much more often and for much longer than most people would guess and then feel disappointed or defeated because the zhooshing has not had the intended effect.  People zigzagging all over the road as they drive home from whatever party they’ve ruined by over-drinking, over-sharing, and over-opining.  People zoom in to see the detail, even of things that disgust them.  People zoos are a thing of the past—so, remember that. 

    People-people are really impressive.  People-people get along with people-persons, generally.  People-people or dog-people.  People-people people the planet, while they’re being people-people, and later go on to be parents raising little people who may or may not turn out to be people-people.  People-people periodically purchasing poodles. 

    People—if they are needy people—like needing other people. 

    People, as Freud said, find life too hard because it brings too many pains, disappointments and impossible tasks, and in order to bear it (‘life,’ that is) take palliative measures—deflections, which cause them to make light of their misery; substitutive satisfactions, which diminish it; and intoxicating substances, which make them insensitive to it:1 and, people, people will tell you, people think that’s really good news and you should take heart and not be so hard on yourselves. 


    1. Paraphrasing Sigmund Freud’s Civilisation and its Discontents (1930). ↩︎

  • Protected: We hope, we hope

    This content is password-protected. To view it, please enter the password below.

  • Would-be oligarch falls to death from sky

    “If only things had turned out differently, 
    this time,” he thinks, undone now by flying.
    His mind’s archives change to melody. They 
    scream a vapid, sentimental song of 
    mayhem in the air that, from down here,
    is just a smudge and smoky curlicue. 
    The old, Austrian seer foretold that death 
    is the subjunctive of our very being. 
    Our birdman, he grasps it now and succumbs 
    to that truth’s sting—his personal pain. 
    In chapels spanning every longitude 
    of its vast motherland, his public hear 
    the solemn knell that tolls his passing hour. 

    Peasants, scholars, drivers on the roads begin 
    to capture his descent on mobile phones. 
    They see it for what it is … proof of life,
    descending earthward, flames. They take a pause.
    The savage boar and all his clan are dead.
    These simple folk believe this life’s no more 
    than a trip to a zoo, where animals 
    root in the dirt and fling their shit about. 
    They thought there was no end to their decline, 
    no respite. Then, a man falls from the sky
    into his grave, and proves the zoo is ours 
    to leave. And governments, disasters, wars, 
    simply, but sometimes by chance, always end.

    Firefighters in Russia (watercolor and acrylic on paper, 20230414) Stephen J. Williams
    Firefighters in Russia (watercolor and acrylic on paper, 20230414) Stephen J. Williams

  • The 193 member states

    The 193 member states

    As the United Nations prepares to pontificate on how democracies defend themselves, it might be useful to remember that across the United Nations’ 193 member states, a substantial proportion are not democratic. According to the 2025 V-Dem report, about 90 states qualify as autocracies, either “electoral autocracies” or “closed autocracies.” Freedom House’s Freedom in the World 2025 survey classifies 59 countries as “Not Free,” meaning citizens lack basic political rights and civil liberties. The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Democracy Index 2024 offers a similar perspective, designating 59 of the 167 states it surveys as authoritarian. Although methodologies differ, these datasets all indicate that roughly one-third to nearly half of UN members fall outside democratic governance.

    A handful of states are unambiguous theocracies. Iran and Afghanistan are clear examples, while Saudi Arabia is often described as a theocratic monarchy. Military juntas are rarer but currently in power in about eight UN members, including Myanmar, Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger, Guinea, Chad, Sudan, and Gabon.

    Sources

    V-Dem 2025 report: https://v-dem.net/documents/54/v-dem_dr_2025_lowres_v1.pdf

    Freedom House 2025: https://freedomhouse.org/…/FITW_World2025digitalN.pdf

    EIU Democracy Index 2024: https://www.eiu.com/n/democracy-index-2024/

  • Goethe was for green (pencil pretending to be a Polaroid, 2025)

    Goethe was for green (pencil pretending to be a Polaroid, 2025) Stephen J. Williams
    Goethe was for green (pencil pretending to be a Polaroid, 2025) Stephen J. Williams